who we are

navigation bar

 table of contents

contact us


RCCHC Services and Products
Cross Currents Newsletter and RCCHC Resources Manual
Linguistic and Cultural Competence Standards Project
National Conference on Cultural Competence
Kaiser Forum on Addressing Language Barriers to Health Care

 

Resources for Cross Cultural Health Care
and the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Office of Minority Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Developing a Research Agenda for
Cultural Competence in Health Care

Project Overview

As a followup to the development of national standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services (CLAS) in health care, Resources for Cross Cultural Health Care will be facilitating the development of a health services research agenda on cultural competence in health care. This project, which will run from November 2000 – December 2001, will encompass the following tasks:

  • Preparing a master literature review of relevant research on cultural competence interventions, especially as related to health outcomes
  • Convening an advisory committee of key researchers, policymakers and providers to review the literature and make recommendations for a research agenda to pursue work in this area
  • Writing and publishing the research agenda
  • Conducting an outreach and dissemination strategy to HHS agencies, research centers, researchers, funders, purchasers, accreditation bodies, policymakers, and providers
  • Implementing an educational and outreach strategy that will include development and maintenance of an website and listserv discussion group to:
  • facilitate networking among researchers, policymakers, and providers
  • post abstracts of current research and ongoing research projects
  • host ongoing feedback on and updating of the research agenda


Background

As policymakers, accreditation bodies, and health care providers are compelled to deliver health services that are culturally and linguistically appropriate, questions inevitably arise about the intrinsic and relative value of different approaches, methods, and programs. These questions may relate to:

  • access and outcomes (which interventions increase access for culturally and linguistically diverse populations to healthcare services and/or improve their health outcomes?)
  • quality and reduction in errors (which interventions increase the provision of appropriate care to and/or reduce the incidence of medical errors among diverse populations?)
  • cost (which interventions are cost effective, e.g., reduce diagnostic testing and emergency room use or increase preventive services lowering future health costs?)
  • comparative analyses (which approaches to interventions work best under what circumstances?)

Common interventions that address cultural and linguistic issues that are identified in the national CLAS standards include:

  • Interpreter services
  • Translated materials
  • Impact of diverse staff
  • Cultural competence training
  • Coordination with traditional healers
  • Community health workers
  • Culturally competence health education
  • Family/community member inclusion
  • Administrative and organizational accommodations to support cultural competence

The questions above suggest at least two kinds of investigative work from which providers and policymakers could benefit. First is the evaluative work that would look at the elements that distinguish quality interventions and would compare one approach with another. For example, Hornberger's work comparing a simultaneous remote interpretation technique with the more usual consecutive in-person technique is one example. This evaluative study approach could be applied to different interpreter approaches, cultural competence training, translation methods, etc.

More challenging, but perhaps more important to those who manage and pay for services, are the research questions related to quality, effectiveness, and outcomes. These questions require considerably more complex and resource-intensive research methodologies.

Contrary to popular perception, research on these issues has been conducted and is of growing interest to the health services research community. Much of this work looks at the impact of attempting to improve communication between clinicians and patients when cultural or linguistic factors are involved.

However, more work needs to be done to raise awareness about the existing evidence base for CLAS-related interventions, and to promote continued research in this area. Advancing a CLAS research agenda involves many tasks. Funding must be made available for this research. A cadre of interested researchers needs to be cultivated and networked. Data sets need to be identified and analyzed.

For example, several institutions with interpreter programs have data that, in the most cursory analysis, supports the cost-effectiveness of their programs and a positive impact on some clinical outcomes. However, these institutions have not had time or resources to investigate these questions more fully, or have not been able to find researchers to do this for them.

Another important task, especially given the limited resources available in this field for research on CLAS services, is better information-sharing about research projects to promote collaboration and avoid duplication of effort. For example, at this time there are at least three projects looking at the cost-effectiveness of interpreter services, and two surveys being developed to quantify the linguistic and culturally appropriate practices of managed care organizations.

Developing the CLAS Research Agenda

In July 1998, the CLAS Standards Project Advisory Committee identified a number of key questions on CLAS research that suggest general issues for further exploration. The questions address definitional, methodological, and research infrastructure issues, and include:

  1. What is CLAS, and what definitions can we agree on? Is it necessary to agree on a single, universal definition?
  2. When doing a literature search, what key words will yield relevant research?
  3. What research studies exist, and what additional research questions need to be answered?
  4. What are the domains of measurement for CLAS interventions?
  5. Where is the data and how hard is it to get?
  6. What methods should be used for analysis, and what are some of the problems of relating CLAS interventions to standard outcomes?
  7. Who should conduct CLAS research, and how should they be involved and networked with each other?
  8. What funding is available for CLAS research and how can interest in this area be nurtured?
  9. What are publication concerns around CLAS research?
  10. How do we translate the research agenda and findings for stakeholders, including providers, policymakers, and other researchers?

These questions have been addressed by the national Research Advisory Committee in its April 2001 meeting and form the basis for the final CLAS research report, which will be available in early 2002.

Individuals interested in providing input into the development of the research agenda and discussion issues related to conducting research on CLAS are invited to review our project input pages.

next >

             
links


 

 

Outcomes Research Agenda for Cultural Competence

Project Overview
  Public input and listserv
  Topical Research Agendas
   

Racial and Ethnic Concordance

  Cultural Competence Training
  Culturally Competent Health Promotion/Education
  Community Health Workers
  Integration of Traditional Healers/Practices
  Family/Community Inclusion
Language Barriers and Interpretation, Patient-Provider Communication, Translation
  Organizational Accommodations to Support Cultural Competence
Final Report (available early 2002)

Assuring Cultural Competence in Health Care: National Standards CLAS Standards project homepage
CLAS Standards Federal Register notice
Cultural competence contract language for managed care

home

go top


    As with the rest of Diversity Rx, this section is a work in progress and we welcome information on other efforts, programs, and reports that will expand upon the information offered here. Please let us know if you have other examples to include here.

essentials | models and practices | policy | legal issues | networking | table of contents | contact us | who we are

Copyright © 2001, DiversityRx; www.diversityRx.org, Last update: Tuesday, March 25, 2003

             

 Diversity Rx is sponsored by:

  NCSL logo
The National Conference of State Legislatures
  RCCHC logo
Resources for Cross Cultural Health Care
  KAISER logo
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation